Occurrence record: invertebrates:G5696
Specimen
of
Austrominius modestus
recorded on 2002-04-12
Dataset
| Data partner | OZCAM (Online Zoological Collections of Australian Museums) Provider |
| Data resource | Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery provider for OZCAM |
| Institution code |
Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery
Supplied institution code "TMAG" |
| Collection code |
Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery Invertebrate Collection
Supplied collection code "invertebrates" |
| Catalog number | G5696 |
| Occurrence ID | urn:catalog:TMAG:invertebrates:G5696 |
| Basis of record | Preserved specimen |
| Identified by | Dr Diana Jones |
| Identified date | 2005 |
| Collector | (Aquenal Pty Ltd) |
| Associated Occurrence Status | Representative record |
| Associated occurrences |
This record has 4 inferred associated occurrences
For more information see Inferred associated occurrence details |
| License | CC-BY |
| Dataset name | Port Survey Collection |
| Occurrence status | present |
| Abcd identification qualifier | Not provided |
| Date identified | 2005 |
Event
| Occurrence date |
2002-04-12
Supplied as year:2002 month:4 day:12 |
| Date precision | Day |
Taxonomy
| Scientific name | Austrominius modestus |
| Taxon rank | species |
| Kingdom | Animalia |
| Phylum | Arthropoda |
| Class | Maxillopoda |
| Order | Sessilia |
| Family | Archaeobalanidae |
| Genus | Austrominius |
| Species | Austrominius modestus |
| Taxonomic issue | No issues |
| Name match metric |
Exact match
The supplied name matched the name exactly. |
| Name parse type | SCIENTIFIC |
Geospatial
| Country | Australia |
| State or Territory | Tasmania |
| Locality | Hobart (C) |
| Locality | P3-0 |
| Latitude | -42.88 |
| Longitude | 147.34 |
| Geodetic datum |
EPSG:4326 Supplied datum: "GDA94" |
| Coordinate precision | Unknown |
| Coordinate uncertainty in meters | 1000.0 |
| County | Hobart: Selfs Point Jetty |
| Biome | Terrestrial |
Additional properties
| dcterms:modified | 2017-10-13 |
Data quality tests
| Test name | Result |
| Habitat incorrect for species | Failed |
| Occurrence status assumed to be present | Warning |
| Coordinates converted to WGS84 | Warning |
| Basis of record not supplied | Passed |
| Basis of record badly formed | Passed |
| Invalid collection date | Passed |
| Incomplete collection date | Passed |
| Identification date before occurrence date | Passed |
| First of the month | Passed |
| Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation | Passed |
| Missing identification date | Passed |
| Collector name unparseable | Passed |
| Missing catalogue number | Passed |
| Data are generalised | Passed |
| Collection code not recognised | Passed |
| Institution code not recognised | Passed |
| Name not supplied | Passed |
| Kingdom not recognised | Passed |
| Name not recognised | Passed |
| Invalid scientific name | Passed |
| Name not in national checklists | Passed |
| Decimal coordinates not supplied | Passed |
| Geodetic datum assumed WGS84 | Passed |
| Unrecognized geodetic datum | Passed |
| Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed | Passed |
| Coordinates are transposed | Passed |
| Coordinates are out of range for species | Passed |
| Supplied coordinates are zero | Passed |
| Zero latitude | Passed |
| Zero longitude | Passed |
| Supplied country not recognised | Passed |
| Coordinate uncertainty not valid | Passed |
| Coordinate uncertainty not specified | Passed |
| Location not supplied | Passed |
| Country inferred from coordinates | Passed |
| Supplied coordinates centre of state | Passed |
| Coordinates centre of country | Passed |
| Missing geodetic datum | Passed |
| Coordinates dont match supplied state | Passed |
| Show/Hide 9 missing properties | |
| Show/Hide 38 tests that have not been run | |
Inferred associated occurrence details
This record has been identified as the representative occurrence in a group of associated occurrences. This mean other records have been detected that seem to relate to this record and this particular record has the most detailed information on the occurrence. More information about the duplication detection methods and terminology in use is available here:
