Occurrence record: Entomology:K.477329
Specimen
of
Sargus darius
recorded on 1995-06-13
Dataset
Data partner | OZCAM (Online Zoological Collections of Australian Museums) Provider |
Data resource | Australian Museum provider for OZCAM |
Institution code |
Australian Museum
Supplied institution code "AM" |
Collection code |
Australian Museum Entomology Collection
Supplied collection code "Entomology" |
Catalog number | K.477329 |
Other catalog numbers | ecatalogue.irn:2225610; urn:catalog:AM:Entomology:K.477329 |
Occurrence ID | urn:lsid:ozcam.taxonomy.org.au:AM:Entomology:K.477329 |
Basis of record | Preserved specimen |
Associated Occurrence Status | Representative record |
Associated occurrences |
This record has 3 inferred associated occurrences
For more information see Inferred associated occurrence details |
License | CC-BY 3.0 (Au) |
Occurrence status | present |
Abcd identification qualifier | Not provided |
Event
Occurrence date | 1995-06-13 |
Date precision | Day |
Event ID | urn:australianmuseum.net.au:Events:1207914 |
Taxonomy
Scientific name |
Sargus darius
Supplied scientific name "Sargus darius Hardy, 1932" |
Taxon rank | species |
Kingdom | Animalia |
Phylum | Arthropoda |
Class | Insecta |
Order | Diptera |
Family | Stratiomyidae |
Genus | Sargus |
Species | Sargus darius |
Taxonomic issue | No issues |
Name match metric |
Exact match
The supplied name matched the name exactly. |
Name parse type | SCIENTIFIC |
Name according to | Hardy, 1932 |
Accepted name usage | Sargus darius Hardy, 1932 |
Geospatial
Country | Australia |
State or Territory | Queensland |
Locality | Cook (S) |
Latitude | -13.883 |
Longitude | 143.166 |
Geodetic datum | EPSG:4326 |
Verbatim coordinate system | 4 |
Verbatim locality | 7 km NNW of Coen |
Location remarks | ecatalogue.LocCollectionEventLocal: "Australia, Queensland, 7 km NNW of Coen (13° 53' S, 143° 10' E) 13/06/1995 - 13/06/1995, Daniels, Greg - Queensland Museum - Entomology(Collector), Daniels, Alice(Collector), Field Collected - Terrestrial"; |
Coordinate precision | 0.001 |
Coordinate uncertainty in meters | 10000.0 |
Biome | Terrestrial |
Verbatim longitude | 143° 10' E |
Verbatim latitude | 13° 53' S |
Additional properties
dcterms:modified | 2020/9/29 |
dcterms:type | PhysicalObject |
verbatim uncertainty | 1km-10km |
Data quality tests
Test name | Result |
Occurrence status assumed to be present | Warning |
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84 | Warning |
Basis of record not supplied | Passed |
Basis of record badly formed | Passed |
Invalid collection date | Passed |
Incomplete collection date | Passed |
First of the month | Passed |
Missing catalogue number | Passed |
Data are generalised | Passed |
Collection code not recognised | Passed |
Institution code not recognised | Passed |
Name not supplied | Passed |
Kingdom not recognised | Passed |
Name not recognised | Passed |
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch | Passed |
Invalid scientific name | Passed |
Name not in national checklists | Passed |
Decimal coordinates not supplied | Passed |
Coordinates are transposed | Passed |
Coordinates are out of range for species | Passed |
Supplied coordinates are zero | Passed |
Zero latitude | Passed |
Zero longitude | Passed |
Supplied country not recognised | Passed |
Coordinate uncertainty not valid | Passed |
Missing coordinate precision | Passed |
Precision / range mismatch | Passed |
Coordinate precision not valid | Passed |
Coordinate uncertainty not specified | Passed |
Location not supplied | Passed |
Country inferred from coordinates | Passed |
Supplied coordinates centre of state | Passed |
Coordinates centre of country | Passed |
Missing geodetic datum | Passed |
Coordinates dont match supplied state | Passed |
Habitat incorrect for species | Passed |
Show/Hide 10 missing properties | |
Show/Hide 40 tests that have not been run |
Inferred associated occurrence details
This record has been identified as the representative occurrence in a group of associated occurrences. This mean other records have been detected that seem to relate to this record and this particular record has the most detailed information on the occurrence. More information about the duplication detection methods and terminology in use is available here: